acercgt
2003/12/14
註冊日期
27
累計好評
120
發文總數
0
科技網站上發表的HTC手機都很漂亮啊
實際做出來卻是~~~~~~不好看~~
http://www.concept-phones.com/htc/
實際做出來卻是~~~~~~不好看~~
http://www.concept-phones.com/htc/
0
1.htc缺乏雲端運用,聯絡簿、照片、資料、甚至運算都無法透過網路直接同步,需透過連接線與電腦同步,太過於落伍。
2.HTC不投入雲端伺服器資源的建立卻花大錢去投資幫助不大的beats潮牌耳機公司,效果證明很有限,併購S3的結過也證明沒有效果,這些費用不如投入雲端應用的建立來得有效。
3.承上,htc手機用戶無法建立自己的htc帳戶,利用這個帳戶使用htc雲端的一切服務,因此htc無法拉住客戶再購買下一隻htc手機,因為客戶所有的資料並不在htc雲端伺服器裡面,客戶的下一隻手機可以更換任何廠牌。apple雲端應用讓客戶無法隨意更換手機廠牌，也就是說apple利用雲端將客戶綁住了不得不用apple手機平板筆電。
4.htc的行銷太沒有創意，根本無法觸動人心想購買該公司手機。
5.htc手機的設計對於女性客戶較無吸引力，不夠細膩也缺乏美感。
6.htc手機缺乏跟其他廠牌手機最獨特的地方，手機不再是比規格比運算速度因為大家做的都差不多，而是在於軟體的應用如何提供客戶更便利更具前瞻性的使用。
2.HTC不投入雲端伺服器資源的建立卻花大錢去投資幫助不大的beats潮牌耳機公司,效果證明很有限,併購S3的結過也證明沒有效果,這些費用不如投入雲端應用的建立來得有效。
3.承上,htc手機用戶無法建立自己的htc帳戶,利用這個帳戶使用htc雲端的一切服務,因此htc無法拉住客戶再購買下一隻htc手機,因為客戶所有的資料並不在htc雲端伺服器裡面,客戶的下一隻手機可以更換任何廠牌。apple雲端應用讓客戶無法隨意更換手機廠牌，也就是說apple利用雲端將客戶綁住了不得不用apple手機平板筆電。
4.htc的行銷太沒有創意，根本無法觸動人心想購買該公司手機。
5.htc手機的設計對於女性客戶較無吸引力，不夠細膩也缺乏美感。
6.htc手機缺乏跟其他廠牌手機最獨特的地方，手機不再是比規格比運算速度因為大家做的都差不多，而是在於軟體的應用如何提供客戶更便利更具前瞻性的使用。
1
There’s a phrase that I read for the first time about a decade ago that has stuck with me ever since. It said: “Before you show the world that you can be the first one to climb a ladder, make sure you set it on the right wall”.
The best way to describe HTC is by calling them the first ones at almost everything. HTC built some of the first touch screen devices we used almost 15 years ago. They built the Compaq iPAQ Pocket PC that steered the revolution that has allowed our website to exist. They were one of the first companies to successfully merge a phone with a PDA even before the term “Smartphone” existed. Your love for a slide-out keyboard has their name on the patent. They were the ones who began the whole “Phonezilla complex” we all love with the 4-inch screen on the HTC HD2. They launched the first 3G Windows Mobile smartphone, built the world’s first Android phone, brought us the first 4G smartphones, and the list goes on. There’s no denying that the phrase they printed on their Touch Diamond a couple of years ago held true, as they called it HTC Innovation.
You’d assume that a company that’s been so great at showing the world where to push should lead it, right? Sadly that’s not always the case, and I’m sure the deceased Palm and Motorola can tell you more about how they’ve failed to survive in the industries they’ve both invented with the PDA and the first cell phone respectively. In a similar way, HTC’s stock took a horrible dive yesterday because they’ve announced yet another quarter of disappointing results. People have already begun to do the inevitable by stating that HTC is the next Nokia and RIM which is a truly unfair comparison in my opinion, since both these later companies have sunk out of arrogance and stubbornness where as HTC has shown how well they’ve been able to reinvent themselves over the years.
So the question is, if HTC has pretty much pioneered the industry we all love, why are they sinking? I have a couple of thoughts on why this is happening, and I’m sure you do too, so let’s begin talking about it:
HTC products need to walk the talk
Being the first ones at everything doesn’t mean that they’re the best, and customers have learned this over the years. Racing to always be the first ones at everything can be as destructive as it is constructive. Great products require time, and a grounded approach to testing them. By grounded approach, I mean that HTC should be the toughest critic of their own products, and not us as reviewers or the end-customer who’ll most likely never buy another HTC product again. Sometimes it seems like if the company was ran by the Marketing team where everything is overestimated and nothing is as good as it’s sold out to be.
I’ll give you the first example of why HTC is great at climbing the ladder before setting it on the right wall. HTC has done a lot of lip service about the “Amazing Camera” on their One X. Sadly, as I sat watching Peter Chou in the One Series keynote back at MWC, I noticed that all he was focusing on was the speed at which the camera app would launch and take the first photo. He did a lot of talking about how they had studied customers and had determined that the device should be ready to take the first photo in just 0.7 seconds. The problem is when they completely miss the fact that people care more about the resulting photos than how long it took them to launch the app. At times when Nokia, Apple and Samsung have already figured out how to provide you with a great camera replacement on your smartphone, HTC has no excuse for failure in something as basic, as giving us the truly amazing camera that they tout.
The same goes for the “Authentic Sound” they’re supposed to deliver with their Beats Audio integration, where I’m still not able to find any significant improvements when compared to what other smartphones can do with simple bass boost.
It’s great to stand in front of a crowd and tell the world how great your device is, but these are times when people don’t forgive products that don’t deliver on their promise.
HTC needs to stop being a tool for carriers
Shouldn’t it be the other way around? Shouldn’t carriers be a tool for HTC to sell their products?
Apple and HTC have completely opposite approaches to dealing with US phone carriers. HTC pretty much used carriers to push their branding and success by allowing them to name their phones as their own, even if you ended up with stupid names like the “Sprint EVO 4G LTE”. Apple on the other hand, having never sold a single phone, felt that the approach was wrong. Carriers should stick to their core business of providing a good spectrum while OEMs deal with what they do best on the hardware and software side of things. Apple even did the unbelievably daring maneuver of sticking to just one carrier for almost three years while HTC was on all of them. So why, o why is it that one company, with just one product, a very controversial approach, and no experience in smartphones has beaten HTC’s dozens of phones on all carriers?
The answer is that Apple was right. They were so right, that Samsung has begun to follow their footsteps with their Galaxy S III, and has already succeeded defeating HTC who already had a couple of months of head start with the One series.
HTC needs to stop betting their company on carriers. Surely they’ll save a buck or two in distribution, but HTC’s branding and innovation is lost in so much of the bloatware that carriers push in their devices. Just try to repeat the name “Verizon Droid Incredible 4G LTE by HTC” without laughing at how ridiculous it is, and tell me if you don’t agree with me in the fact that carriers don’t get it. There was nothing wrong with the design of the HTC One series, and still, Sprint and Verizon wanted their own names and variants, which as a result have diluted all of HTC’s marketing efforts in pushing the One X as “the One you’ve been waiting for”.
HTC needs to be bigger
Years ago, everybody used either MWC or CES to announce their products. It’s only smart to use these famous trade shows to expose your products to the world. Samsung isn’t playing that game any more with their flagship line-up though. They’ve understood how degrading it is for their products to be considered just another release at a specific trade show. They’ve grown-up, and they want their products to receive the entire spotlight whenever they “unpack” them.
HTC isn’t a small company, but they need to begin behaving as a big one. Their One series marketing campaign, while good, has been mute just months after the One X was launched. It takes more sacrifice to have your own press events, your own sales distribution and to lose a couple of bucks in landing exclusive deals with carriers, but in the long run, Samsung and Apple have shown us how it pays off. At times, it feels as if HTC stops believing in their own products just months after they release them, as they focus on their next batch of variants. If you don’t agree with me, just tell me why their beloved Desire HD isn’t getting Ice Cream Sandwich hauling better specs than the HTC One V.
Sense needs to make sense
I wish somebody at HTC read this and answered a simple question: What happened to HTCSense.com? Here’s an example of a good product that was ditched because of their lack of persistence, even if they say they’re working on a newer version. They somehow understood that the secret lies in the ecosystem, but have sadly not pushed it enough to succeed, in a similar way they forget about their older smartphones.
HTC’s software experience is another example of how they’ve quickly climbed the wrong wall. HTC Sense is pretty, but that’s actually both good and bad. It’s good because it’s far more elegant than the rest of the launchers on other competing smartphones, but it’s bad because Android is mainly used by men. I’m not saying that as guys we don’t prefer an elegant UI, but our male psyche prefers those things that are practical when compared to those things that are beautiful. HTC has proven to be stubborn in making HTC Sense the most beautiful UI in the market even if we don’t care. As a result, they’ve even made NVIDIA’s quad-core Tegra 3 processor look bad when running all the fluff in Sense 4.0. I’m sure that all of you would agree with me that we’d all care less if the UI was less refined if we were allowed to get the speed that we’re looking for on a quad-core processor we just bought.
HTC needs Jelly Bean. I’ve said this before. Whether they snap Sense into it or not is something we still don’t know, but I wish they’d re-orient their focus on making this a fluid experience, and not just a pretty one. If they made the bold move of giving us the option to install stock Jelly Bean with just a couple of HTC Sense widgets, they’d find a loyal customer in me going forward. Android isn’t broken any more, and HTC needs to stop trying to fix it.
The bottom line
Just as HTC has done in the past, they need to re-invent themselves again. This time, they need to innovate in their approach a lot more than they do in their products. This time it’s no longer about being the first to launch new features if they can’t be bold enough to also be the best at them.
Every time I hold my One X, I get a clear sense for all the thoughtfulness that went into the design and I praise those brilliant people that pushed the limits of their hardware. It actually infuriates me that Samsung can be more successful at selling a phone that has cheaper build-quality at an even higher price tag than the well-made One X. HTC doesn’t deserve to lose in this game. The world would be at loss if they did.
Obviously, I’m not saying that everything I wrote is what should happen. I’m sure you all have better ideas of how HTC can regain its glory days. Be sure to share them in the comments down bellow.
The best way to describe HTC is by calling them the first ones at almost everything. HTC built some of the first touch screen devices we used almost 15 years ago. They built the Compaq iPAQ Pocket PC that steered the revolution that has allowed our website to exist. They were one of the first companies to successfully merge a phone with a PDA even before the term “Smartphone” existed. Your love for a slide-out keyboard has their name on the patent. They were the ones who began the whole “Phonezilla complex” we all love with the 4-inch screen on the HTC HD2. They launched the first 3G Windows Mobile smartphone, built the world’s first Android phone, brought us the first 4G smartphones, and the list goes on. There’s no denying that the phrase they printed on their Touch Diamond a couple of years ago held true, as they called it HTC Innovation.
You’d assume that a company that’s been so great at showing the world where to push should lead it, right? Sadly that’s not always the case, and I’m sure the deceased Palm and Motorola can tell you more about how they’ve failed to survive in the industries they’ve both invented with the PDA and the first cell phone respectively. In a similar way, HTC’s stock took a horrible dive yesterday because they’ve announced yet another quarter of disappointing results. People have already begun to do the inevitable by stating that HTC is the next Nokia and RIM which is a truly unfair comparison in my opinion, since both these later companies have sunk out of arrogance and stubbornness where as HTC has shown how well they’ve been able to reinvent themselves over the years.
So the question is, if HTC has pretty much pioneered the industry we all love, why are they sinking? I have a couple of thoughts on why this is happening, and I’m sure you do too, so let’s begin talking about it:
HTC products need to walk the talk
Being the first ones at everything doesn’t mean that they’re the best, and customers have learned this over the years. Racing to always be the first ones at everything can be as destructive as it is constructive. Great products require time, and a grounded approach to testing them. By grounded approach, I mean that HTC should be the toughest critic of their own products, and not us as reviewers or the end-customer who’ll most likely never buy another HTC product again. Sometimes it seems like if the company was ran by the Marketing team where everything is overestimated and nothing is as good as it’s sold out to be.
I’ll give you the first example of why HTC is great at climbing the ladder before setting it on the right wall. HTC has done a lot of lip service about the “Amazing Camera” on their One X. Sadly, as I sat watching Peter Chou in the One Series keynote back at MWC, I noticed that all he was focusing on was the speed at which the camera app would launch and take the first photo. He did a lot of talking about how they had studied customers and had determined that the device should be ready to take the first photo in just 0.7 seconds. The problem is when they completely miss the fact that people care more about the resulting photos than how long it took them to launch the app. At times when Nokia, Apple and Samsung have already figured out how to provide you with a great camera replacement on your smartphone, HTC has no excuse for failure in something as basic, as giving us the truly amazing camera that they tout.
The same goes for the “Authentic Sound” they’re supposed to deliver with their Beats Audio integration, where I’m still not able to find any significant improvements when compared to what other smartphones can do with simple bass boost.
It’s great to stand in front of a crowd and tell the world how great your device is, but these are times when people don’t forgive products that don’t deliver on their promise.
HTC needs to stop being a tool for carriers
Shouldn’t it be the other way around? Shouldn’t carriers be a tool for HTC to sell their products?
Apple and HTC have completely opposite approaches to dealing with US phone carriers. HTC pretty much used carriers to push their branding and success by allowing them to name their phones as their own, even if you ended up with stupid names like the “Sprint EVO 4G LTE”. Apple on the other hand, having never sold a single phone, felt that the approach was wrong. Carriers should stick to their core business of providing a good spectrum while OEMs deal with what they do best on the hardware and software side of things. Apple even did the unbelievably daring maneuver of sticking to just one carrier for almost three years while HTC was on all of them. So why, o why is it that one company, with just one product, a very controversial approach, and no experience in smartphones has beaten HTC’s dozens of phones on all carriers?
The answer is that Apple was right. They were so right, that Samsung has begun to follow their footsteps with their Galaxy S III, and has already succeeded defeating HTC who already had a couple of months of head start with the One series.
HTC needs to stop betting their company on carriers. Surely they’ll save a buck or two in distribution, but HTC’s branding and innovation is lost in so much of the bloatware that carriers push in their devices. Just try to repeat the name “Verizon Droid Incredible 4G LTE by HTC” without laughing at how ridiculous it is, and tell me if you don’t agree with me in the fact that carriers don’t get it. There was nothing wrong with the design of the HTC One series, and still, Sprint and Verizon wanted their own names and variants, which as a result have diluted all of HTC’s marketing efforts in pushing the One X as “the One you’ve been waiting for”.
HTC needs to be bigger
Years ago, everybody used either MWC or CES to announce their products. It’s only smart to use these famous trade shows to expose your products to the world. Samsung isn’t playing that game any more with their flagship line-up though. They’ve understood how degrading it is for their products to be considered just another release at a specific trade show. They’ve grown-up, and they want their products to receive the entire spotlight whenever they “unpack” them.
HTC isn’t a small company, but they need to begin behaving as a big one. Their One series marketing campaign, while good, has been mute just months after the One X was launched. It takes more sacrifice to have your own press events, your own sales distribution and to lose a couple of bucks in landing exclusive deals with carriers, but in the long run, Samsung and Apple have shown us how it pays off. At times, it feels as if HTC stops believing in their own products just months after they release them, as they focus on their next batch of variants. If you don’t agree with me, just tell me why their beloved Desire HD isn’t getting Ice Cream Sandwich hauling better specs than the HTC One V.
Sense needs to make sense
I wish somebody at HTC read this and answered a simple question: What happened to HTCSense.com? Here’s an example of a good product that was ditched because of their lack of persistence, even if they say they’re working on a newer version. They somehow understood that the secret lies in the ecosystem, but have sadly not pushed it enough to succeed, in a similar way they forget about their older smartphones.
HTC’s software experience is another example of how they’ve quickly climbed the wrong wall. HTC Sense is pretty, but that’s actually both good and bad. It’s good because it’s far more elegant than the rest of the launchers on other competing smartphones, but it’s bad because Android is mainly used by men. I’m not saying that as guys we don’t prefer an elegant UI, but our male psyche prefers those things that are practical when compared to those things that are beautiful. HTC has proven to be stubborn in making HTC Sense the most beautiful UI in the market even if we don’t care. As a result, they’ve even made NVIDIA’s quad-core Tegra 3 processor look bad when running all the fluff in Sense 4.0. I’m sure that all of you would agree with me that we’d all care less if the UI was less refined if we were allowed to get the speed that we’re looking for on a quad-core processor we just bought.
HTC needs Jelly Bean. I’ve said this before. Whether they snap Sense into it or not is something we still don’t know, but I wish they’d re-orient their focus on making this a fluid experience, and not just a pretty one. If they made the bold move of giving us the option to install stock Jelly Bean with just a couple of HTC Sense widgets, they’d find a loyal customer in me going forward. Android isn’t broken any more, and HTC needs to stop trying to fix it.
The bottom line
Just as HTC has done in the past, they need to re-invent themselves again. This time, they need to innovate in their approach a lot more than they do in their products. This time it’s no longer about being the first to launch new features if they can’t be bold enough to also be the best at them.
Every time I hold my One X, I get a clear sense for all the thoughtfulness that went into the design and I praise those brilliant people that pushed the limits of their hardware. It actually infuriates me that Samsung can be more successful at selling a phone that has cheaper build-quality at an even higher price tag than the well-made One X. HTC doesn’t deserve to lose in this game. The world would be at loss if they did.
Obviously, I’m not saying that everything I wrote is what should happen. I’m sure you all have better ideas of how HTC can regain its glory days. Be sure to share them in the comments down bellow.
0
很現代感的外觀,很適合水岸邊的建築,
淡水河二側好看的建築物沒幾棟.....
淡水河二側好看的建築物沒幾棟.....
0
促買最新戰機 美想扒台三層皮？
2011-09-22 中國時報 【吳明杰／特稿】
外傳美國防部即將公布的「台灣空軍軍力報告」，建議台灣空軍應購買能短場起降的F-35B戰機。不過，如果美願意出售最新的F-35B，台灣怎還會退而求其次爭取生產線都快關閉的F-16C/D？五角大廈報告還建議台灣購買F-35B，似乎是要台灣畫餅充飢。
八年前台灣空軍開始著手規劃第三代戰機採購計畫，原就鎖定號稱有短場和垂直起降能力的F-35等型JSF聯合攻擊戰機。當時台灣向美方提出共同參與該機型的研發計畫，後來美方連讓台灣參與研發計畫四個等級中的第一級（最低等級）都不願意，我方才在2006年轉而決定採購勉強算「二代半」的F-16C/D戰機，以填補空防戰力空隙。
同樣的，在美方拒絕台灣參與F-35研發計畫後，台灣軍方也曾向美提出採購這次美方建議的AV-8B海獵鷹戰機意向，表明台灣軍方願意接收二手的美軍陸戰隊AV-8B，不過美方後來也無正面回應。
從台灣的作戰需求來說，真正屬於第三代戰機的F-35B戰機，本來就是首選。美方若真有意協助台灣防衛安全，根本不用再扯屬於二代戰機的F-16C/D戰機或A/B型的性能提升案。
美方現只同意F-16A/B型性能提升案，又說F-16C/D案也未拒絕，然後又建議台灣採購F-35B，不知是顧忌中共壓力，還是又想藉軍售扒台灣三層皮。
2011-09-22 中國時報 【吳明杰／特稿】
外傳美國防部即將公布的「台灣空軍軍力報告」，建議台灣空軍應購買能短場起降的F-35B戰機。不過，如果美願意出售最新的F-35B，台灣怎還會退而求其次爭取生產線都快關閉的F-16C/D？五角大廈報告還建議台灣購買F-35B，似乎是要台灣畫餅充飢。
八年前台灣空軍開始著手規劃第三代戰機採購計畫，原就鎖定號稱有短場和垂直起降能力的F-35等型JSF聯合攻擊戰機。當時台灣向美方提出共同參與該機型的研發計畫，後來美方連讓台灣參與研發計畫四個等級中的第一級（最低等級）都不願意，我方才在2006年轉而決定採購勉強算「二代半」的F-16C/D戰機，以填補空防戰力空隙。
同樣的，在美方拒絕台灣參與F-35研發計畫後，台灣軍方也曾向美提出採購這次美方建議的AV-8B海獵鷹戰機意向，表明台灣軍方願意接收二手的美軍陸戰隊AV-8B，不過美方後來也無正面回應。
從台灣的作戰需求來說，真正屬於第三代戰機的F-35B戰機，本來就是首選。美方若真有意協助台灣防衛安全，根本不用再扯屬於二代戰機的F-16C/D戰機或A/B型的性能提升案。
美方現只同意F-16A/B型性能提升案，又說F-16C/D案也未拒絕，然後又建議台灣採購F-35B，不知是顧忌中共壓力，還是又想藉軍售扒台灣三層皮。
0
軍方研究 自製潛艦
【聯合報╱記者許紹軒／台北報導】 2011.09.19 12:53 pm
國防部採購柴電潛艦遭到美方冷處理多年，國防部高層證實，已展開自製潛艦的研究，但因潛艦研製難度高，仍須多方蒐集資訊，同時也將從先進國家引進技術。
據透露，國內造船業者接受軍方委託，與某個美國以外、具完整造艦能力的國家接觸多時，初步獲正面回應。
立委周守訓表示，樂見國防部願意自行研發先進武器，相信也能獲得朝野共識，立法院一定會支持預算。
柴電潛艦多年無著落，國防部更在明年編列象徵性地五十萬元預算用於採購潛艦，足見此案難度之高。
據了解，最近一段時間，潛艦二五六戰隊與海發中心都相當忙碌，積極審視劍龍級潛艦的藍圖，也有消息指稱，海軍將透過某些管道，前往海外汲取經驗、洽商技術轉移，用以製造潛艦最重要的壓力殼，將先從數百噸的小型潛艦著手。
長榮大學企管系教授徐強曾任中船董事長，任內曾大力推動潛艦國造，他對軍方有意自製樂觀其成，但也坦承，現在的國際環境比起當年更險峻。
【2011/09/19 聯合報】@ http://udn.com/
全文網址: 軍方研究 自製潛艦 | 政治 | 國內要聞 | 聯合新聞網 http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT1/6598375.shtml#ixzz1YT7WsqZN
Power By udn.com
【聯合報╱記者許紹軒／台北報導】 2011.09.19 12:53 pm
國防部採購柴電潛艦遭到美方冷處理多年，國防部高層證實，已展開自製潛艦的研究，但因潛艦研製難度高，仍須多方蒐集資訊，同時也將從先進國家引進技術。
據透露，國內造船業者接受軍方委託，與某個美國以外、具完整造艦能力的國家接觸多時，初步獲正面回應。
立委周守訓表示，樂見國防部願意自行研發先進武器，相信也能獲得朝野共識，立法院一定會支持預算。
柴電潛艦多年無著落，國防部更在明年編列象徵性地五十萬元預算用於採購潛艦，足見此案難度之高。
據了解，最近一段時間，潛艦二五六戰隊與海發中心都相當忙碌，積極審視劍龍級潛艦的藍圖，也有消息指稱，海軍將透過某些管道，前往海外汲取經驗、洽商技術轉移，用以製造潛艦最重要的壓力殼，將先從數百噸的小型潛艦著手。
長榮大學企管系教授徐強曾任中船董事長，任內曾大力推動潛艦國造，他對軍方有意自製樂觀其成，但也坦承，現在的國際環境比起當年更險峻。
【2011/09/19 聯合報】@ http://udn.com/
全文網址: 軍方研究 自製潛艦 | 政治 | 國內要聞 | 聯合新聞網 http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT1/6598375.shtml#ixzz1YT7WsqZN
Power By udn.com
0
俄羅斯的T-50,大陸不可能買,台灣或許有機會
自己研發才是正確的選擇
自己研發才是正確的選擇
0
http://www.panoramio.com/
南沙群島都被大陸,越南人佔領啦,
連google earth都是他們的照片.
馬政府不敢派兵去,網友們自己派兵去吧,
請大家上google earth貼圖佔領全部版面
南沙群島都被大陸,越南人佔領啦,
連google earth都是他們的照片.
馬政府不敢派兵去,網友們自己派兵去吧,
請大家上google earth貼圖佔領全部版面
0
大家把照片貼上GOOGLE EARTH吧
http://www.panoramio.com/
立委：南沙駐軍 才有談判籌碼
2011-06-22 新聞速報 【中央社】
中國國民黨籍立委帥化民今天表示，政府應派出海軍陸戰隊在南沙群島駐軍，未來在漁業等資源談判時，才握有坐上談判桌的門票；國民黨籍立委林郁方也說，駐軍才有談判籌碼。
南沙爭議問題近日來越演越烈，不僅菲律賓、越南都有動作，中國時報今天報導，傳出中國大陸首艘航空母艦即將下水，並以南海作為主要假想海域。
帥化民說，南海是東南亞各國爭取權益的區域，中國自從明朝鄭和下西洋開始，一直想在南海建立勢力，但過去南海的資源開發不到水準，現在開發資源的技術進步，加上世界能源越來越少，各國都想在南海搶資源。
帥化民說，南沙群島有機場、有淡水，雖然距離台灣遠隔千里，但是台灣在南海有優勢，現在只有海巡署進駐，如果能改由海軍陸戰隊駐軍，意義與強度都不同。帥化民說，既然台灣在南海有地利之便，為何不加強？
他認為，未來南海地區的漁業、石油等其他資源談判，都需要有占領的事實，這等於是張門票，其他國家近日來的動作，就是買門票的行為，台灣也不應該缺席。帥化民說，海巡署不算軍隊，雖可宣示管理權，但強度不夠、意義上也比較差一點。
林郁方認為，南海是重要的石油探勘與採集地，沒有駐軍將沒有任何的談判籌碼，他也憂心，各國在南沙加強戰備，未來武裝衝突的可能性增大，台灣要小心不要被波及。
林郁方擔憂的說，越南與中國大陸之間一旦擦槍走火，可能把戰火點燃到太平島，太平島是當地唯一有淡水的最大島，雙方交戰，如果進入太平島海域或空域，該怎麼辦？戰事在太平島周遭爆發的話，駐軍要求離開當地的海域跟空域，但沒有守軍在那邊，誰會理你，「沒有軍隊在那只能說可笑」。
民主進步黨籍立委黃偉哲表示，當南海問題風起雲湧時，如果他國已經有駐軍，台灣就應該跟進駐軍，這也考驗著馬政府的外交判斷，如果誤判情勢，將可能造成台灣主權與尊嚴的損失。黃偉哲也提醒政府應注意海巡署的火力夠不夠，以及當地海巡署人員的安全。1000622
http://www.panoramio.com/
立委：南沙駐軍 才有談判籌碼
2011-06-22 新聞速報 【中央社】
中國國民黨籍立委帥化民今天表示，政府應派出海軍陸戰隊在南沙群島駐軍，未來在漁業等資源談判時，才握有坐上談判桌的門票；國民黨籍立委林郁方也說，駐軍才有談判籌碼。
南沙爭議問題近日來越演越烈，不僅菲律賓、越南都有動作，中國時報今天報導，傳出中國大陸首艘航空母艦即將下水，並以南海作為主要假想海域。
帥化民說，南海是東南亞各國爭取權益的區域，中國自從明朝鄭和下西洋開始，一直想在南海建立勢力，但過去南海的資源開發不到水準，現在開發資源的技術進步，加上世界能源越來越少，各國都想在南海搶資源。
帥化民說，南沙群島有機場、有淡水，雖然距離台灣遠隔千里，但是台灣在南海有優勢，現在只有海巡署進駐，如果能改由海軍陸戰隊駐軍，意義與強度都不同。帥化民說，既然台灣在南海有地利之便，為何不加強？
他認為，未來南海地區的漁業、石油等其他資源談判，都需要有占領的事實，這等於是張門票，其他國家近日來的動作，就是買門票的行為，台灣也不應該缺席。帥化民說，海巡署不算軍隊，雖可宣示管理權，但強度不夠、意義上也比較差一點。
林郁方認為，南海是重要的石油探勘與採集地，沒有駐軍將沒有任何的談判籌碼，他也憂心，各國在南沙加強戰備，未來武裝衝突的可能性增大，台灣要小心不要被波及。
林郁方擔憂的說，越南與中國大陸之間一旦擦槍走火，可能把戰火點燃到太平島，太平島是當地唯一有淡水的最大島，雙方交戰，如果進入太平島海域或空域，該怎麼辦？戰事在太平島周遭爆發的話，駐軍要求離開當地的海域跟空域，但沒有守軍在那邊，誰會理你，「沒有軍隊在那只能說可笑」。
民主進步黨籍立委黃偉哲表示，當南海問題風起雲湧時，如果他國已經有駐軍，台灣就應該跟進駐軍，這也考驗著馬政府的外交判斷，如果誤判情勢，將可能造成台灣主權與尊嚴的損失。黃偉哲也提醒政府應注意海巡署的火力夠不夠，以及當地海巡署人員的安全。1000622
0
最近去三重找朋友看一棟超像國外建築物的預售案子
不知道賣得貴不貴
有人有去看過嗎?
不知道賣得貴不貴
有人有去看過嗎?
0
去世貿一館看家具展
有個普瑞思床墊標榜都是外銷國外
但都沒聽過
不知道有人買過這個牌子的床墊嗎
品質如何
好睡嗎?
有個普瑞思床墊標榜都是外銷國外
但都沒聽過
不知道有人買過這個牌子的床墊嗎
品質如何
好睡嗎?
0
早收清單業者,估計可能受益的中小企業家數2萬2700家，受益中小企業聘僱員工數42.6萬人。
這些關稅降為零的業者,除了增加本身產品競爭力外也代表公司獲利增加,更應該將利益分享給員工,
所以後ECFA時代,加薪是必要的~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~請大家發聲支持!
這些關稅降為零的業者,除了增加本身產品競爭力外也代表公司獲利增加,更應該將利益分享給員工,
所以後ECFA時代,加薪是必要的~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~請大家發聲支持!
0
阿婆茶葉蛋 陸客也瘋狂 <br> <br>【聯合報╱記者蔡惠萍／台北報導】 2010.02.08 05:32 am <br> <br> <br> <br>茶葉蛋阿婆鄒金盆個性開朗，對導遊向陸客介紹她是「五十年前的辣妹」，她拉著十八歲的外孫女說，「我們祖孫長得很像，都很文靜，怎會是辣妹」。<br>記者紀文禮／攝影 <br>你有沒有聽過賣茶葉蛋的小攤子公休還得先向政府「報備」的事？這聽來匪夷所思，但就發生在日月潭玄光寺茶葉蛋阿婆鄒金盆的身上。<br><br>已在玄光寺碼頭旁設攤半世紀的鄒金盆，利用南投當地出產的阿薩姆紅茶及埔里香菇熬製茶葉蛋，由於風味獨特，隨著陸客開放而爆紅，假日經常賣上五、六千顆，創造庶民經濟的傳奇；還因太受歡迎，觀光局日月潭風管處特別商請阿嬤如果休工，「麻煩先通知一聲」，以免隔天旅客撲空被罵慘。<br><br>從小就在日月潭畔長大、今年八十歲的鄒金盆，民國四十九年就已領到據說是當地唯一的攤販執照，丈夫詹萬厚是日月潭船伕。但她起初不賣茶葉蛋，為了討生活，什麼都賣過。後來看日月潭旺季時，船老大忙得沒吃飯，靈機一動，賣起方便食用的茶葉蛋，美味秘訣在於比別人多了一味酖人情味。<br><br>阿婆生意本就不惡，一天約可賣七、八百顆。前年開放陸客後，竟一夕爆紅，除了獨特配方，還要歸功於船老大賣力促銷。陸客來日月潭搭船遊湖，船老大就會「預告」說，「待會上岸後，就會看到『日月潭之花』，有位最漂亮的十八歲『辣妹』專門賣茶葉蛋...，」通常聽到這裡，旅客個個眼睛發亮、猛吞口水，但船老大這時就會適時「補充」一句：但因兩岸一直沒開放觀光，「我跟各位帥哥報告一下，她已經賣了五十幾年了！」<br><br>陸客一上岸就會直驅「辣妹茶葉蛋」，雖然看到的不是十八歲辣妹，而是八十歲阿嬤，但憑著口耳相傳，銷量不僅直線上升，還吸引大陸中央電視台專程渡海採訪。原只是老夫妻餬口的小攤，一顆十元的茶葉蛋，居然變成祖孫三代全部投入的家族事業。日管處統計，假日一天可以賣上五、六千顆，不過，鄒金盆含蓄否認，「沒啦！頂多三、四千顆。」<br><br>剛開始，很多陸客掏出百元人民幣買茶葉蛋，讓鄒金盆很為難：「乾脆我送你吃好了！」現在不僅收人民幣，也有人民幣標價；她說，最高紀錄有人當場吃了十顆，還有人一次買四百元，害她還替客人煩惱「安捺是要吃到什麼時候？」不少陸客希望她推出「太空包」，好帶回給親友品嘗。<br><br>鄒金盆攤位意外成為觀光景點，日管處也為她設計了一個美觀的木造攤位。日管處笑說，自從阿婆茶葉蛋紅了以後，日月潭到處都看得到阿婆茶葉蛋，「就算是阿公開的，也要找個阿婆來賣。」 <br><br> <br>
0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOPQ32R2ZoY俄羅斯第五代戰鬥機（T－50）29日進行首次試飛獲得成功。官員表示，這是以極機密方式進行的俄國軍隊現代化計畫的內容之一。法新社報導，由「蘇愷公司」製造的第五代PAK FA戰機在俄國遠東地區的阿穆爾河畔共青城（Komsomolsk-on-Amur），也就是公司的基地進行約47分鐘的試飛。
蘇愷發言人卡由科瓦（Olga Kayukova）告訴「國際傳真社」（Interfax）：「試飛很成功，並且持續了47分鐘。所有為首次飛行預想的任務皆成功完成。」國營電視播放該戰機著陸的場景，聲稱是首度對外公布該戰機的影像。
中通社報導，據悉俄第五代戰機原型機代號T－50，假定作戰目標是美國最先進的F－22猛禽和F－35閃電2型攻擊戰鬥機，其性能亦與美兩款戰機分庭抗禮。
報導說，T－50具有隱身能力，可24小時隱蔽使用，並且能維持長時間超音速飛行，航程達5500公里，該戰機並可配備下一代空對空、空對地、空對艦飛彈和30毫米口徑機炮。Interfax報導，此款新型戰機能以超音速進行長途飛行，同時攻擊不同目標。報導指出，俄國自1990年代以來就開始研發這款新戰機，預計將自2015年起服役。
專家說，由於俄羅斯第五代戰鬥機在當地首次滑行試驗時即顯示出良好性能，因此專家決定不將這一殲擊機運到莫斯科的基地進行首次試飛，而讓它在阿穆爾河畔共青城直接試飛。
據台灣自由時報報導，俄國前空軍司令科努可夫說，蘇愷27與米格29戰機雖然性能優異，但使用已超過20年，是到了該汰換的時候。目前全球只有美國擁有第五代戰機，但俄國發展T－50也有軍售上的考量。蘇愷公司是俄國最大的軍機出口商，而最大客戶就是印度。據報導，俄國與印度2007年10月簽約合夥開發T－50，雙方各出資一半，預料單價近1億美元。
T-50小檔案
製造商 蘇愷公司
資金來源 俄印合資
假想敵 美軍F-22猛禽匿蹤戰機、F-35閃電2型攻擊戰鬥機
性能 長20米，高7米多。可進行俯仰、擺尾和橫控制。能夠超音速長途飛行，最大航速可達2馬赫左右。可匿蹤、同步多目標攻擊，可攜帶八枚飛彈，所有武器內置。航程估計5000公里左右。
單價 近1億美元
服役時間 預計2015年
1
http://img440.imageshack.us/content.php?page=done&l=img440/3905/rc118792.jpg&via=mupload原設計車頭造型沒有特色
車燈造型跟福特I-MAX~有抄襲問題
在此提供一個想法
大家討論一下
建議趕快推出小改款吧
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
另外車尾的設計也將提出修改想法
0
CRV3副駕駛座椅行駛中會不斷發出~~扣扣~~怪聲
不知道是座椅沒安裝好還是車體鋼性問題?
各位車主有這種問題發生嗎?
不知道是座椅沒安裝好還是車體鋼性問題?
各位車主有這種問題發生嗎?
0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly-BqbTIvVs
0
請看影片
http://videoportal.aol.tw/video-detail//3338982680
請自行連結
http://videoportal.aol.tw/video-detail//3338982680
請自行連結
0
機場捷運線目前預定要蓋到中壢市,為了服務廣大的北台灣民眾,
及串聯北部產業帶,應該要延伸到新竹科學園區,可帶來最大效益!
由中壢站往南延伸設置
平鎮市站
幼獅工業區站
楊梅站
湖口站
新竹工業區站(湖口工業區站)
新竹縣政府站
新竹生技園區(台灣大學新竹校區站)
新竹科學園區站
各位看法如何?
http://img2.imageshack.us/my.php?image=91205024.jpg
及串聯北部產業帶,應該要延伸到新竹科學園區,可帶來最大效益!
由中壢站往南延伸設置
平鎮市站
幼獅工業區站
楊梅站
湖口站
新竹工業區站(湖口工業區站)
新竹縣政府站
新竹生技園區(台灣大學新竹校區站)
新竹科學園區站
各位看法如何?
http://img2.imageshack.us/my.php?image=91205024.jpg
0
有關淡水鎮聯外道路壅塞,也沒有腹地可供開闢道路,
本人建議如下:
1.經由已拓寬的西濱快速道路以及已通車的東西向快速道路,由台北港往北延伸,開闢淡水河下的隧道通達對岸淡水鎮,再延伸到淡水新市鎮.
2.可將進出淡水的車潮,由原本的中正路,分散到台北港這邊快速道路進出.
3.淡水新市鎮可藉由這條道路的開闢,讓進出交通更方便,加速開發.
4.採用這個方案只要解決淡水河下的過河隧道就可,其餘大都是未建築的空地,經費不會太高,效益是最大的.
本人建議如下:
1.經由已拓寬的西濱快速道路以及已通車的東西向快速道路,由台北港往北延伸,開闢淡水河下的隧道通達對岸淡水鎮,再延伸到淡水新市鎮.
2.可將進出淡水的車潮,由原本的中正路,分散到台北港這邊快速道路進出.
3.淡水新市鎮可藉由這條道路的開闢,讓進出交通更方便,加速開發.
4.採用這個方案只要解決淡水河下的過河隧道就可,其餘大都是未建築的空地,經費不會太高,效益是最大的.
共
22
則