我發這篇文的用意，並不是見納就反、逢納必諷的意思。而是認為納廠有"自我感覺良好"，這種要命的缺點。這是一種"恨鐵不成鋼"的心情，雖然大家都知道鐵不可能變成鋼... 人家奇瑞敢大手筆，聘請Mini前首席設計師、在歐洲設總部給外國人設計研發。所有新車款，全送測撞高規格要求。反觀納廠不但品質出問題，國內更出現專法律漏洞等重大問題。 如果繼續這樣搞下去，只怕又是一台"台朔汽車"的歷史重演... 曇花一現的"臺灣華系車"，恐怕又會變成裕隆"不可直稱名稱"的汽車佛地魔...

我發這篇文的用意，並不是見納就反、逢納必諷的意思。而是認為納廠有"自我感覺良好"，這種要命的缺點。這是一種"恨鐵不成鋼"的心情，雖然大家都知道鐵不可能變成鋼... 人家奇瑞敢大手筆，聘請Mini前首席設計師、在歐洲設總部給外國人設計研發。所有新車款，全送測撞高規格要求。反觀納廠不但品質出問題，國內更出現鑽法律漏洞等重大問題。 如果繼續這樣搞下去，只怕又是一台"台朔汽車"的歷史重演... 曇花一現的"臺灣華系車"，恐怕又會變成裕隆"不可直稱名稱"的汽車佛地魔...

[quote=jozhu65 (請注意)]為什麼要損成這樣? 畢竟是僅是不多的台灣品牌, 就算不支持也該祝福 [昏倒][/quote] 你會認為這叫做損，我的解釋是憂心提出建議。我不會不支持就損人家，就像韓國人我雖然不喜歡、但我不會叫你一定不買韓國商品。新汽車品牌就是要採低價策略，建立口碑後才會提高價格。當初Lexus剛設立，就賣得比百年車場還貴、你認為現在還會在嗎? 當初現代汽車用低價策略，打進世界市場佔市占率、往後開始拼高品質且調回一般正常價位。現在現代汽車全球銷售量前三名，跟日本雙田各踞山頭。 有人說中國賓士是廉價不安全的，這完全都是錯誤觀念。報導中提到賓士那台賣約34萬人民幣(約158萬4000)，但納智傑ceo(194萬7300)來看、任何一個人都覺得怪。不論車型式否相同，光"賓士"竟然賣的比"納智傑"低就很詭異。 你靠"臺灣車"在大陸可以賣，不缺油的俄羅斯或許沒很大問題。但日本、韓國、加拿大、美國、中南美洲國家、還有最難搞的歐洲哩? 新車廠還是以低價銷售，高品質來賺口碑、這樣會比較好。

[quote=jozhu65 (請注意)]為什麼要損成這樣? 畢竟是僅是不多的台灣品牌, 就算不支持也該祝福 [昏倒][/quote] 你會認為這叫做損，我的解釋是憂心提出建議。我不會不支持就損人家，就像韓國人我雖然不喜歡、但我不會叫你一定不買韓國商品。新汽車品牌就是要採低價策略，建立口碑後才會提高價格。當初Lexus剛設立，就賣得比百年車場還貴、你認為現在還會在嗎? 當初現代汽車用低價策略，打進世界市場佔市占率、往後開始拼高品質且調回一般正常價位。現在現代汽車全球銷售量前三名，跟日本雙田各踞山頭。 有人說中國賓士是廉價不安全的，這完全都是錯誤觀念。如果外國車廠授權給中國，就是廉價不安全、那位何可以賣到十幾萬人民幣? 如果這說詞可行，豐田受全合泰製作也不就是廉價也不安全? 報導中提到賓士那台賣約34萬人民幣(約158萬4000)，但納智傑ceo(194萬7300)來看、任何一個人都覺得怪。不論車型式否相同，光"賓士"竟然賣的比"納智傑"低就很詭異。 你靠"臺灣車"在大陸可以賣，不缺油的俄羅斯或許沒很大問題。但日本、韓國、加拿大、美國、中南美洲國家、還有最難搞的歐洲哩? 新車廠還是以低價銷售，高品質來賺口碑、這樣會比較好。

貼出我所寫的信: The death penalty may not stop crime, but stop the death penalty would lower the crime and unlawful killing? 死刑或許無法阻止犯罪，但停止死刑會幫助降低犯罪及殺人? I’m citizen from Taiwan, the EU and Amnesty International (AI) condemn our death row executions, use “It is abhorrent to justify taking someone's life because prisons are overcrowded or the public's alleged support for the death penalty" is humiliate Taiwan law and imply Taiwan people are sanguine. 我是台灣的公民，歐盟以及國際特赦組織評論我們死刑、是以"監獄人滿為患，以及百姓要求來合理化奪取人性命"一番言論是汙辱我國法律，以及暗指台灣百姓嗜血成性。 And use threaten to give low human rights evaluation, is most irrelevant way to publicize no death row execution to other country. The death row in many nation still exist, some also have death with lynch. But EU and AI has no condemn those yet. The Japan, Korea, China, US also have death row and execution too. Why say nothing to theme? 使用降低人權評比來威脅，是對於其它國家宣揚廢死理念最無效的辦法。在很多國家尚有死刑，甚至還有動用私刑處死的案例。歐盟與特赦組織確尚未有批評。日本、韓國、中國大陸、甚至美國也有死刑判例以及執行，為何卻不予以評論? The human rights are no one can take others right, and life too. But the six death row prisoners are taken innocent peoples life. How those prisoners have any human rights? 人權因違不得奪取他人權利以及生命。可是六名死刑犯卻奪取無辜生命，這些犯人何來人權之有? The one prisoner had kill before and send to jail, the judge give release on parole. This man goes to a cram school, use gun to execute girlfriend and got on surveillance camera, just because he think the girl don’t love him anymore. And other two had killed a female insurance agent and real estate clerk; they cut the corps in pieces and boil to eat. The news say those two say to the procurator, “The woman’s breasts are fresh and tender!” 有ㄧ位犯人之前因殺人入獄，經法官假釋後跑去補習班、以槍擊斃女朋友，就因為他認為女友變心。還有另外兩位，殺了女保險員跟地產員，而且分屍煮來吃。據新聞報導，這兩名罪犯還稱"女人胸不多汁軟嫩!"。 Even a murderer cut a 10 years old child throat with cutter, he say” In Taiwan kill one or two won’t be sentence execution, and I can have warm bed and free meal!” Which one of them had human rights idea in theme when they kill someone? 還有用刀割10歲男童喉嚨致死的犯人，嗆說"在台灣殺一兩個人不會判死刑""在監獄我有溫暖床鋪還有食物"。這些犯人在殺人時，哪一位有"人權"的想法? The some prisoners still say they are not guilt, and some say they wish government to execution theme. Our judicature uses more than dozen judge to judge, by evidence from video, DNA on the weapon, even remains of victim body in murderer excrement. So the sentence to dead, are not rash and unreasonable. 目前為止尚有犯人說自己無罪，也有些要求政府槍決。我們司法使用超過一打法官，審視罪證如影帶、兇器上的DNA、甚至犯人排泄物中的受害者遺骸。所以死刑判決，並不草率不可信。 The EU and AI had use over decades to discuss and research, how to use other punish replace death row and had people’s common consensus. But demand Taiwan to stop immediately by do nothing to propagate and convince Taiwan people. The “say anything but do nothing” and criticize other country are unfair and persuasiveness. 歐盟及特赦組織花費數十年討論及研究，如何使用替代方案來取代死刑、以及取得大眾之普遍認同。可是對於台灣卻要求立即停止死刑，卻不對台灣百姓遊說或許認同。只說不做卻又批評其他國家，是不公平與無說服力。 Also the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP) says” Stop death row now, and the murderers can release on parole, only have to give psychotherapy.” ” Only God can decision take man’s life!” The TAEDP also had been accuse force and roar to ask victim’s family to forgive murderer. The TAEDP had not give substance suggest and publicize idea, to those critic resort to law but not thrust oneself out to face a challenge. 而且台灣廢死聯盟大喊"停止執行死刑""死刑犯可假釋出獄，以精神療養治療即可""只有神可以決定人的生死"，廢死聯盟也被質疑逼迫且對受害者家屬咆嘯、要求家屬對加害者與以原諒。廢死聯盟並無給實際建議以及宣揚理念，對於批評者並訴以法律告訴、而非勇敢的出來面對大眾質疑。 The TAEDP been criticizing unprincipled protection murderer, but do nothing with victim’s family, no mass communication there claim and face debate. That lead to public opinion still highly requests death row execution existence. So the Taiwan peoples indignant say to EU and AI “Mind your own business!” “This is our nation; don’t tell me how to do rule!” 廢死聯盟還被指責過於偏袒加害人，但對於受害者家屬卻無動於衷。且無對大眾宣傳理念，以及逃避質疑及辯論。這使得大眾依然認為死刑必須存在，且須依法執行。故台灣百姓才氣憤，對歐盟及特赦組織有"管好自己就好""這是我們的國家，別指揮我們怎樣管理"的言論。 To gain support should take by action, but only criticize and command won’t work. Those support stop death row do nothing, only want others to agree there idea. To most Taiwan people feel repulsive, say they “What the splendors and applause, but won’t give any efforts to gin!” 要獲得別人支持需要有實際行動，但只有批評以及命令別人不會有效果。那些支持廢死的並無行動，只要其他人同意他們的想法。對於多數台灣人來說，這些人是"只要功勞與掌聲，但卻不付出努力來換取"的一群人罷了。

貼出我所寫的信: The death penalty may not stop crime, but stop the death penalty would lower the crime and unlawful killing? 死刑或許無法阻止犯罪，但停止死刑會幫助降低犯罪及殺人? I’m citizen from Taiwan, the EU and Amnesty International (AI) condemn our death row executions, use “It is abhorrent to justify taking someone's life because prisons are overcrowded or the public's alleged support for the death penalty" is humiliate Taiwan law and imply Taiwan people are sanguine. 我是台灣的公民，歐盟以及國際特赦組織評論我們死刑、是以"監獄人滿為患，以及百姓要求來合理化奪取人性命"一番言論是汙辱我國法律，以及暗指台灣百姓嗜血成性。 And use threaten to give low human rights evaluation, is most irrelevant way to publicize no death row execution to other country. The death row in many nation still exist, some also have death with lynch. But EU and AI has no condemn those yet. The Japan, Korea, China, US also have death row and execution too. Why say nothing to theme? 使用降低人權評比來威脅，是對於其它國家宣揚廢死理念最無效的辦法。在很多國家尚有死刑，甚至還有動用私刑處死的案例。歐盟與特赦組織確尚未有批評。日本、韓國、中國大陸、甚至美國也有死刑判例以及執行，為何卻不予以評論? The human rights are no one can take others right, and life too. But the six death row prisoners are taken innocent peoples life. How those prisoners have any human rights? 人權因不得奪取他人權利以及生命。可是六名死刑犯卻奪取無辜生命，這些犯人何來人權之有? The one prisoner had kill before and send to jail, the judge give release on parole. This man goes to a cram school, use gun to execute girlfriend and got on surveillance camera, just because he think the girl don’t love him anymore. And other two had killed a female insurance agent and real estate clerk; they cut the corps in pieces and boil to eat. The news say those two say to the procurator, “The woman’s breasts are fresh and tender!” 有ㄧ位犯人之前因殺人入獄，經法官假釋後跑去補習班、以槍擊斃女朋友，就因為他認為女友變心。還有另外兩位，殺了女保險員跟地產員，而且分屍煮來吃。據新聞報導，這兩名罪犯還稱"女人胸不多汁軟嫩!"。 Even a murderer cut a 10 years old child throat with cutter, he say” In Taiwan kill one or two won’t be sentence execution, and I can have warm bed and free meal!” Which one of them had human rights idea in theme when they kill someone? 還有用刀割10歲男童喉嚨致死的犯人，嗆說"在台灣殺一兩個人不會判死刑""在監獄我有溫暖床鋪還有食物"。這些犯人在殺人時，哪一位有"人權"的想法? The some prisoners still say they are not guilt, and some say they wish government to execution theme. Our judicature uses more than dozen judge to judge, by evidence from video, DNA on the weapon, even remains of victim body in murderer excrement. So the sentence to dead, are not rash and unreasonable. 目前為止尚有犯人說自己無罪，也有些要求政府槍決。我們司法使用超過一打法官，審視罪證如影帶、兇器上的DNA、甚至犯人排泄物中的受害者遺骸。所以死刑判決，並不草率不可信。 The EU and AI had use over decades to discuss and research, how to use other punish replace death row and had people’s common consensus. But demand Taiwan to stop immediately by do nothing to propagate and convince Taiwan people. The “say anything but do nothing” and criticize other country are unfair and persuasiveness. 歐盟及特赦組織花費數十年討論及研究，如何使用替代方案來取代死刑、以及取得大眾之普遍認同。可是對於台灣卻要求立即停止死刑，卻不對台灣百姓遊說或許認同。只說不做卻又批評其他國家，是不公平與無說服力。 Also the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP) says” Stop death row now, and the murderers can release on parole, only have to give psychotherapy.” ” Only God can decision take man’s life!” The TAEDP also had been accuse force and roar to ask victim’s family to forgive murderer. The TAEDP had not give substance suggest and publicize idea, to those critic resort to law but not thrust oneself out to face a challenge. 而且台灣廢死聯盟大喊"停止執行死刑""死刑犯可假釋出獄，以精神療養治療即可""只有神可以決定人的生死"，廢死聯盟也被質疑逼迫且對受害者家屬咆嘯、要求家屬對加害者與以原諒。廢死聯盟並無給實際建議以及宣揚理念，對於批評者並訴以法律告訴、而非勇敢的出來面對大眾質疑。 The TAEDP been criticizing unprincipled protection murderer, but do nothing with victim’s family, no mass communication there claim and face debate. That lead to public opinion still highly requests death row execution existence. So the Taiwan peoples indignant say to EU and AI “Mind your own business!” “This is our nation; don’t tell me how to do rule!” 廢死聯盟還被指責過於偏袒加害人，但對於受害者家屬卻無動於衷。且無對大眾宣傳理念，以及逃避質疑及辯論。這使得大眾依然認為死刑必須存在，且須依法執行。故台灣百姓才氣憤，對歐盟及特赦組織有"管好自己就好""這是我們的國家，別指揮我們怎樣管理"的言論。 To gain support should take by action, but only criticize and command won’t work. Those support stop death row do nothing, only want others to agree there idea. To most Taiwan people feel repulsive, say they “What the splendors and applause, but won’t give any efforts to gin!” 要獲得別人支持需要有實際行動，但只有批評以及命令別人不會有效果。那些支持廢死的並無行動，只要其他人同意他們的想法。對於多數台灣人來說，這些人是"只要功勞與掌聲，但卻不付出努力來換取"的一群人罷了。

貼出我所寫的信: The death penalty may not stop crime, but stop the death penalty would lower the crime and unlawful killing? 死刑或許無法阻止犯罪，但停止死刑會幫助降低犯罪及殺人? I’m citizen from Taiwan, the EU and Amnesty International (AI) condemn our death row executions, use “It is abhorrent to justify taking someone's life because prisons are overcrowded or the public's alleged support for the death penalty" is humiliate Taiwan law and imply Taiwan people are sanguine. 我是台灣的公民，歐盟以及國際特赦組織評論我們死刑、是以"監獄人滿為患，以及百姓要求來合理化奪取人性命"一番言論是汙辱我國法律，以及暗指台灣百姓嗜血成性。 And use threaten to give low human rights evaluation, is most irrelevant way to publicize no death row execution to other country. The death row in many nation still exist, some also have death with lynch. But EU and AI has no condemn those yet. The Japan, Korea, China, US also have death row and execution too. Why say nothing to theme? 使用降低人權評比來威脅，是對於其它國家宣揚廢死理念最無效的辦法。在很多國家尚有死刑，甚至還有動用私刑處死的案例。歐盟與特赦組織確尚未有批評。日本、韓國、中國大陸、甚至美國也有死刑判例以及執行，為何卻不予以評論? The human rights are no one can take others right, and life too. But the six death row prisoners are taken innocent peoples life. How those prisoners have any human rights? 人權因不得奪取他人權利以及生命。可是六名死刑犯卻奪取無辜生命，這些犯人何來人權之有? The one prisoner had kill before and send to jail, the judge give release on parole. This man goes to a cram school, use gun to execute girlfriend and got on surveillance camera, just because he think the girl don’t love him anymore. And other two had killed a female insurance agent and real estate clerk; they cut the corps in pieces and boil to eat. The news say those two say to the procurator, “The woman’s breasts are fresh and tender!” 有ㄧ位犯人之前因殺人入獄，經法官假釋後跑去補習班、以槍擊斃女朋友，就因為他認為女友變心。還有另外兩位，殺了女保險員跟地產員，而且分屍煮來吃。據新聞報導，這兩名罪犯還稱"女人胸部多汁軟嫩!"。 Even a murderer cut a 10 years old child throat with cutter, he say” In Taiwan kill one or two won’t be sentence execution, and I can have warm bed and free meal!” Which one of them had human rights idea in theme when they kill someone? 還有用刀割10歲男童喉嚨致死的犯人，嗆說"在台灣殺一兩個人不會判死刑""在監獄我有溫暖床鋪還有食物"。這些犯人在殺人時，哪一位有"人權"的想法? The some prisoners still say they are not guilt, and some say they wish government to execution theme. Our judicature uses more than dozen judge to judge, by evidence from video, DNA on the weapon, even remains of victim body in murderer excrement. So the sentence to dead, are not rash and unreasonable. 目前為止尚有犯人說自己無罪，也有些要求政府槍決。我們司法使用超過一打法官，審視罪證如影帶、兇器上的DNA、甚至犯人排泄物中的受害者遺骸。所以死刑判決，並不草率不可信。 The EU and AI had use over decades to discuss and research, how to use other punish replace death row and had people’s common consensus. But demand Taiwan to stop immediately by do nothing to propagate and convince Taiwan people. The “say anything but do nothing” and criticize other country are unfair and persuasiveness. 歐盟及特赦組織花費數十年討論及研究，如何使用替代方案來取代死刑、以及取得大眾之普遍認同。可是對於台灣卻要求立即停止死刑，卻不對台灣百姓遊說或許認同。只說不做卻又批評其他國家，是不公平與無說服力。 Also the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP) says” Stop death row now, and the murderers can release on parole, only have to give psychotherapy.” ” Only God can decision take man’s life!” The TAEDP also had been accuse force and roar to ask victim’s family to forgive murderer. The TAEDP had not give substance suggest and publicize idea, to those critic resort to law but not thrust oneself out to face a challenge. 而且台灣廢死聯盟大喊"停止執行死刑""死刑犯可假釋出獄，以精神療養治療即可""只有神可以決定人的生死"，廢死聯盟也被質疑逼迫且對受害者家屬咆嘯、要求家屬對加害者與以原諒。廢死聯盟並無給實際建議以及宣揚理念，對於批評者並訴以法律告訴、而非勇敢的出來面對大眾質疑。 The TAEDP been criticizing unprincipled protection murderer, but do nothing with victim’s family, no mass communication there claim and face debate. That lead to public opinion still highly requests death row execution existence. So the Taiwan peoples indignant say to EU and AI “Mind your own business!” “This is our nation; don’t tell me how to do rule!” 廢死聯盟還被指責過於偏袒加害人，但對於受害者家屬卻無動於衷。且無對大眾宣傳理念，以及逃避質疑及辯論。這使得大眾依然認為死刑必須存在，且須依法執行。故台灣百姓才氣憤，對歐盟及特赦組織有"管好自己就好""這是我們的國家，別指揮我們怎樣管理"的言論。 To gain support should take by action, but only criticize and command won’t work. Those support stop death row do nothing, only want others to agree there idea. To most Taiwan people feel repulsive, say they “What the splendors and applause, but won’t give any efforts to gin!” 要獲得別人支持需要有實際行動，但只有批評以及命令別人不會有效果。那些支持廢死的並無行動，只要其他人同意他們的想法。對於多數台灣人來說，這些人是"只要功勞與掌聲，但卻不付出努力來換取"的一群人罷了。

貼出我所寫的信: The death penalty may not stop crime, but stop the death penalty would lower the crime and unlawful killing? 死刑或許無法阻止犯罪，但停止死刑會幫助降低犯罪及殺人? I’m citizen from Taiwan, the EU and Amnesty International (AI) condemn our death row executions, use “It is abhorrent to justify taking someone's life because prisons are overcrowded or the public's alleged support for the death penalty" is humiliate Taiwan law and imply Taiwan people are sanguine. 我是台灣的公民，歐盟以及國際特赦組織評論我們死刑、是以"監獄人滿為患，以及百姓要求來合理化奪取人性命"一番言論是汙辱我國法律，以及暗指台灣百姓嗜血成性。 And use threaten to give low human rights evaluation, is most irrelevant way to publicize no death row execution to other country. The death row in many nation still exist, some also have death with lynch. But EU and AI has no condemn those yet. The Japan, Korea, China, US also have death row and execution too. Why say nothing to theme? 使用降低人權評比來威脅，是對於其它國家宣揚廢死理念最無效的辦法。在很多國家尚有死刑，甚至還有動用私刑處死的案例。歐盟與特赦組織確尚未有批評。日本、韓國、中國大陸、甚至美國也有死刑判例以及執行，為何卻不予以評論? The human rights are no one can take others right, and life too. But the six death row prisoners are taken innocent peoples life. How those prisoners have any human rights? 人權因不得奪取他人權利以及生命。可是六名死刑犯卻奪取無辜生命，這些犯人何來人權之有? The one prisoner had kill before and send to jail, the judge give release on parole. This man goes to a cram school, use gun to execute girlfriend and got on surveillance camera, just because he think the girl don’t love him anymore. And other two had killed a female insurance agent and real estate clerk; they cut the corps in pieces and boil to eat. The news say those two say to the procurator, “The woman’s breasts are fresh and tender!” 有ㄧ位犯人之前因殺人入獄，經法官假釋後跑去補習班、以槍擊斃女朋友，就因為他認為女友變心。還有另外兩位，殺了女保險員跟地產員，而且分屍煮來吃。據新聞報導，這兩名罪犯還稱"女人胸部多汁軟嫩!"。 Even a murderer cut a 10 years old child throat with cutter, he say” In Taiwan kill one or two won’t be sentence execution, and I can have warm bed and free meal!” Which one of them had human rights idea in theme when they kill someone? 還有用刀割10歲男童喉嚨致死的犯人，嗆說"在台灣殺一兩個人不會判死刑""在監獄我有溫暖床鋪還有食物"。這些犯人在殺人時，哪一位有"人權"的想法? The some prisoners still say they are not guilt, and some say they wish government to execution theme. Our judicature uses more than dozen judge to judge, by evidence from video, DNA on the weapon, even remains of victim body in murderer excrement. So the sentence to dead, are not rash and unreasonable. 目前為止尚有犯人說自己無罪，也有些要求政府槍決。我們司法使用超過多位法官，審視罪證如影帶、兇器上的DNA、甚至犯人排泄物中的受害者遺骸。所以死刑判決，並不草率不可信。 The EU and AI had use over decades to discuss and research, how to use other punish replace death row and had people’s common consensus. But demand Taiwan to stop immediately by do nothing to propagate and convince Taiwan people. The “say anything but do nothing” and criticize other country are unfair and persuasiveness. 歐盟及特赦組織花費數十年討論及研究，如何使用替代方案來取代死刑、以及取得大眾之普遍認同。可是對於台灣卻要求立即停止死刑，卻不對台灣百姓遊說或許認同。只說不做卻又批評其他國家，是不公平與無說服力。 Also the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP) says” Stop death row now, and the murderers can release on parole, only have to give psychotherapy.” ” Only God can decision take man’s life!” The TAEDP also had been accuse force and roar to ask victim’s family to forgive murderer. The TAEDP had not give substance suggest and publicize idea, to those critic resort to law but not thrust oneself out to face a challenge. 而且台灣廢死聯盟大喊"停止執行死刑""死刑犯可假釋出獄，以精神療養治療即可""只有神可以決定人的生死"，廢死聯盟也被質疑逼迫且對受害者家屬咆嘯、要求家屬對加害者與以原諒。廢死聯盟並無給實際建議以及宣揚理念，對於批評者並訴以法律告訴、而非勇敢的出來面對大眾質疑。 The TAEDP been criticizing unprincipled protection murderer, but do nothing with victim’s family, no mass communication there claim and face debate. That lead to public opinion still highly requests death row execution existence. So the Taiwan peoples indignant say to EU and AI “Mind your own business!” “This is our nation; don’t tell me how to do rule!” 廢死聯盟還被指責過於偏袒加害人，但對於受害者家屬卻無動於衷。且無對大眾宣傳理念，以及逃避質疑及辯論。這使得大眾依然認為死刑必須存在，且須依法執行。故台灣百姓才氣憤，對歐盟及特赦組織有"管好自己就好""這是我們的國家，別指揮我們怎樣管理"的言論。 To gain support should take by action, but only criticize and command won’t work. Those support stop death row do nothing, only want others to agree there idea. To most Taiwan people feel repulsive, say they “What the splendors and applause, but won’t give any efforts to gin!” 要獲得別人支持需要有實際行動，但只有批評以及命令別人不會有效果。那些支持廢死的並無行動，只要其他人同意他們的想法。對於多數台灣人來說，這些人是"只要功勞與掌聲，但卻不付出努力來換取"的一群人罷了。

貼出我所寫的信: The death penalty may not stop crime, but stop the death penalty would lower the crime and unlawful killing? 死刑或許無法阻止犯罪，但停止死刑會幫助降低犯罪及殺人? I’m citizen from Taiwan, the EU and Amnesty International (AI) condemn our death row executions, use “It is abhorrent to justify taking someone's life because prisons are overcrowded or the public's alleged support for the death penalty" is humiliate Taiwan law and imply Taiwan people are sanguine. 我是台灣的公民，歐盟以及國際特赦組織評論我們死刑、是以"監獄人滿為患，以及百姓要求來合理化奪取人性命"一番言論是汙辱我國法律，以及暗指台灣百姓嗜血成性。 And use threaten to give low human rights evaluation, is most irrelevant way to publicize no death row execution to other country. The death row in many nation still exist, some also have death with lynch. But EU and AI has no condemn those yet. The Japan, Korea, China, US also have death row and execution too. Why say nothing to theme? 使用降低人權評比來威脅，是對於其它國家宣揚廢死理念最無效的辦法。在很多國家尚有死刑，甚至還有動用私刑處死的案例。歐盟與特赦組織確尚未有批評。日本、韓國、中國大陸、甚至美國也有死刑判例以及執行，為何卻不予以評論? The human rights are no one can take others right, and life too. But the six death row prisoners are taken innocent peoples life. How those prisoners have any human rights? 人權因不得奪取他人權利以及生命。可是六名死刑犯卻奪取無辜生命，這些犯人何來人權之有? The one prisoner had kill before and send to jail, the judge give release on parole. This man goes to a cram school, use gun to execute girlfriend and got on surveillance camera, just because he think the girl don’t love him anymore. And other two had killed a female insurance agent and real estate clerk; they cut the corps in pieces and boil to eat. The news say those two say to the procurator, “The woman’s breasts are fresh and tender!” 有ㄧ位犯人之前因殺人入獄，經法官假釋後跑去補習班、以槍擊斃女朋友，就因為他認為女友變心。還有另外兩位，殺了女保險員跟地產員，而且分屍煮來吃。據新聞報導，這兩名罪犯還稱"女人胸部多汁軟嫩!"。 Even a murderer cut a 10 years old child throat with cutter, he say” In Taiwan kill one or two won’t be sentence execution, and I can have warm bed and free meal!” Which one of them had human rights idea in theme when they kill someone? 還有用刀割10歲男童喉嚨致死的犯人，嗆說"在台灣殺一兩個人不會判死刑""在監獄我有溫暖床鋪還有食物"。這些犯人在殺人時，哪一位有"人權"的想法? The some prisoners still say they are not guilt, and some say they wish government to execution theme. Our judicature uses more than dozen judge to judge, by evidence from video, DNA on the weapon, even remains of victim body in murderer excrement. So the sentence to dead, are not rash and unreasonable. 目前為止尚有犯人說自己無罪，也有些要求政府槍決。我們司法使用超過多位法官，審視罪證如影帶、兇器上的DNA、甚至犯人排泄物中的受害者遺骸。所以死刑判決，並不草率不可信。 The EU and AI had use over decades to discuss and research, how to use other punish replace death row and had people’s common consensus. But demand Taiwan to stop immediately by do nothing to propagate and convince Taiwan people. The “say anything but do nothing” and criticize other country are unfair and persuasiveness. 歐盟及特赦組織花費數十年討論及研究，如何使用替代方案來取代死刑、以及取得大眾之普遍認同。可是對於台灣卻要求立即停止死刑，卻不對台灣百姓遊說獲取認同。只說不做卻又批評其他國家，是不公平與無說服力。 Also the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP) says” Stop death row now, and the murderers can release on parole, only have to give psychotherapy.” ” Only God can decision take man’s life!” The TAEDP also had been accuse force and roar to ask victim’s family to forgive murderer. The TAEDP had not give substance suggest and publicize idea, to those critic resort to law but not thrust oneself out to face a challenge. 而且台灣廢死聯盟大喊"停止執行死刑""死刑犯可假釋出獄，以精神療養治療即可""只有神可以決定人的生死"，廢死聯盟也被質疑逼迫且對受害者家屬咆嘯、要求家屬對加害者與以原諒。廢死聯盟並無給實際建議以及宣揚理念，對於批評者並訴以法律告訴、而非勇敢的出來面對大眾質疑。 The TAEDP been criticizing unprincipled protection murderer, but do nothing with victim’s family, no mass communication there claim and face debate. That lead to public opinion still highly requests death row execution existence. So the Taiwan peoples indignant say to EU and AI “Mind your own business!” “This is our nation; don’t tell me how to do rule!” 廢死聯盟還被指責過於偏袒加害人，但對於受害者家屬卻無動於衷。且無對大眾宣傳理念，以及逃避質疑及辯論。這使得大眾依然認為死刑必須存在，且須依法執行。故台灣百姓才氣憤，對歐盟及特赦組織有"管好自己就好""這是我們的國家，別指揮我們怎樣管理"的言論。 To gain support should take by action, but only criticize and command won’t work. Those support stop death row do nothing, only want others to agree there idea. To most Taiwan people feel repulsive, say they “What the splendors and applause, but won’t give any efforts to gin!” 要獲得別人支持需要有實際行動，但只有批評以及命令別人不會有效果。那些支持廢死的並無行動，只要其他人同意他們的想法。對於多數台灣人來說，這些人是"只要功勞與掌聲，但卻不付出努力來換取"的一群人罷了。

[嘆氣]我論述還是沒變，你有主張就該努力去爭取支持。廢死聯盟或歐盟認為，人非神不可剝奪任何人生命、執行死刑是不文明及不人道。那為何提不出具體替代方案，以及勇於面對質疑? 平日不積極去爭取認同，事後再以哭泣與表示無奈、並不會多一份支持。 要台灣民眾以"終身監禁不得假釋"、或以其它替代逞罰來換廢死刑。廢死聯盟跟歐盟人權協會是否要具體來表示，舉辦公聽會與百姓面談、解釋為何要求廢除死刑。替代方案詳細內容為何，以及所耗費社會成本、以及面對百姓質疑勇於替自己辯護。 畢竟殺一條人命何其重大，若罪犯只口頭上說懺悔就可輕判或假釋出獄、那若再犯時請問廢死刑的支持者如何是好?不要只會批評，自己卻不努力去尋求支持。"只想要功勞，卻不願付出苦勞"，這就是我對廢死支持者一貫的看法。廢死支持者們，如果你們願意多花時間去行動、今天台灣民調就不會還是高達八成多支持死刑。如果你們自己夠努力，能說服百姓就不會被人質疑是假清高了。

[嘆氣]我論述還是沒變，你有主張就該努力去爭取支持。廢死聯盟或歐盟認為，人非神不可剝奪任何人生命、執行死刑是不文明及不人道。那為何提不出具體替代方案，以及勇於面對質疑? 平日不積極去爭取認同，事後再以哭泣與表示無奈、並不會多一份支持。 要台灣民眾以"終身監禁不得假釋"、或以其它替代逞罰來換廢死刑。廢死聯盟跟歐盟人權協會是否要具體來表示，舉辦公聽會與百姓面談、解釋為何要求廢除死刑。替代方案詳細內容為何，以及所耗費社會成本、以及面對百姓質疑勇於替自己辯護。 畢竟殺一條人命何其重大，若罪犯只口頭上說懺悔就可輕判或假釋出獄、那若再犯時請問廢死刑的支持者如何是好?不要只會批評，自己卻不努力去尋求支持。"只想要功勞，卻不願付出苦勞"，這就是我對廢死支持者一貫的看法。廢死支持者們，如果你們願意多花時間去行動、今天台灣民調就不會還是高達八成多支持死刑。如果你們自己夠努力，能說服百姓就不會被人質疑是假清高了。

[quote=onetwolo (四季)] 據說是縱容危險駕駛，這個行車的速度和在道路上魯莽的方式，是在幻想的基礎上， 與現實世界中顯然是不同的性格。 最終的決定得出結論，該廣告描繪的速度，可能會鼓勵駕駛人在行車上不負責任，縱容危險駕駛。 姑且不論被投訴原因，以行銷來說這的確是很高招、可說是很好的廣告以我個人而言。台灣廣告商，連人家1/10都...不對1/100能力都沒有... [微笑] [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLThzvsPCkI[/youtube] [/quote]

[quote=onetwolo (四季)] 據說是縱容危險駕駛，這個行車的速度和在道路上魯莽的方式，是在幻想的基礎上， 與現實世界中顯然是不同的性格。 最終的決定得出結論，該廣告描繪的速度，可能會鼓勵駕駛人在行車上不負責任，縱容危險駕駛。 [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLThzvsPCkI[/youtube] [/quote] 姑且不論被投訴原因，以行銷來說這的確是很高招、可說是很好的廣告以我個人而言。台灣廣告商，連人家1/10都...不對1/100都沒有...[微笑]